ADR at cervical and lumbar spine (anterior approach)
A rapidly developing alternative to spinal fusion surgery, artificial disc replacement is a procedure that involves replacing a painful disc that is causing chronic back pain with an artificial disc that provides pain relief without compromising the spine’s natural anatomical structure. Artificial disc replacement surgery may be performed on the lower back (lumbar spine) or the neck (cervical spine). Artificial discs are structurally similar to the damaged discs that are replaced and share similar functions, including acting as shock absorbers in the back or neck.
Artificial disc replacement surgery technology, or non-fusion spine surgery, for the lumbar and cervical spine is a specialty of Barcelona Back Institute. When you are considering artificial disc replacement surgery over spinal fusion, it is important to understand that experience performing artificial disc replacement surgery is critical. Dr. Bartolomé Oliver and Dr. Emilio Ayats at Barcelona Back Institute are among the most experienced spine surgeons in Europe, having performed numerous artificial disc replacement surgeries and pioneered a variety of procedures.
The principle behind using artificial disc replacement surgery for treating spine pain and conditions is to enable a surgeon to treat a patient’s condition with the cervical or lumbar spine that usually arises as a result of aging or degenerating discs without using fusion, which alters a spine’s normal movement.
Artificial disc replacement aims to replace a bad disc that is causing pain with a mobile artificial disc, rather than removing the disc and fusing the vertebrae together, which is what takes place in a spinal fusion. The artificial disc allows the spine to maintain its natural mobility and theoretically prevents abnormal motion or stress on adjacent spinal segments. This abnormal motion or stress can result in the degeneration that is believed to be the cause of long-term spinal fusion failure.
Lateral ADR at lumbar spine
The development of the lateral approach allows today the possibility of offering TDR when the disc to be replaced is above L5-S1. The risks of the anterior approach are eliminated and neurophysiologic monitoring of the nerves decreases the risk of traction injuries of the lumbar plexus in its transpsoas trajectory. The XL procedure is what is termed a “minimally invasive” procedure. This means that instead of a traditional, larger single incision, the procedure is performed through one or more small incisions and an instrument known as a retractor is used to spread the tissues so that the surgeon can see the spine. This is made possible by the use of a dilator and retractor system, MaXcess®, developed by NuVasive®, Inc, in San Diego, CA. The system allows the surgeon to reach the spine via lateral access (from the side of the body).
Older lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) devices require an anterior approach for implantation. This approach has inherent limitations, including risks to abdominal structures and the need for resection of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL). Placement of a TDR device from a true lateral (extreme lateral [XL]) approach is thought to offer a less invasive option to access the disc space (reduced risk of interrupting blood circulation in the left leg, significantly reduced risk of arterial thromboembolism, reduced risk of plaque embolism with arteriosclerosis), preserving the stabilizing ligaments and avoiding scarring of anterior vasculature.
When L5-S1 has to be included in the surgical treatment, anterior TDR at this level or hybrid procedures (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [TLIF] or ALIF with cages and pedicles screws, versus Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with Dynesys at L5-S1 and XL-TDR at L4-5 or/and L3-4) could be performed.
A revision rate of 5.6% has been reported. Postoperative transient psoas weakness and anterior thigh numbness have been reported, both resolving within 2 weeks. 2.8% of cases demonstrated weakness of the leg ipsilateral to the approach side, which lasted through the 3-month visit but was resolved by the 6-month visit.
The benefits of this technique include minimal morbidity, avoiding mobilization of the great vessels, preserving the ALL, biomechanically stable orientation, and broader revision options than in anterior approach.
Minimally invasive spine surgery technology allows surgeons to reach the spine through several smaller incisions (as opposed to a single large incision). The majority of surgeons believe minimally invasive surgery is advantageous because it may allow for less tissue trauma, less scarring, shorter hospital stays and less postoperative discomfort, thereby affording a decreased need for post-operative pain medication.
Like all minimally invasive spine surgery techniques, the XL procedure was designed to treat disorders of the spine with the least amount of tissue (muscle, ligament, blood vessels and abdominal organs) disruption possible, so that there is minimal tissue-related damage from the surgery and the recovery time is therefore reduced.
There are a series of steps to complete an XL TDR:
- First, the patient will be positioned lying on his or her side. Then the surgeon will use x-rays to locate the disc that will be removed.
- Once the disc is located, the surgeon will mark the skin with a marker directly above the disc.
- Then the surgeon will make a small incision (cut) in the flank (low back region of the trunk) and use his or her finger to push away the peritoneum (sac covering the abdominal organs) from the abdominal wall.
- The surgeon will make a second incision directly on the side of the patient, or only this second incision.
- The surgeon will then insert a tube-like instrument known as a dilator into this incision.
- The surgeon will use x-rays to make sure that this dilator is in a good position above the disc.
- The surgeon will then insert a probe (blunt tool) through a muscle known as the psoas muscle. The psoas muscle is a large muscle that runs from the lower spine, wrapping around the pelvic area and attaches at the hip. A monitoring device allows detecting any retraction stress on the nerves allowing replacing the retractor in a position avoiding the nerve stretching a potential damage.
- A complete discectomy is performed
- The appropriate ADR prosthesis size is selected and inserted in the void disc space with a controlled distraction to recover the desired disc space height.
With an XL procedure, the following recovery facts are typical:
- Pain at the incision sites after surgery is normal and should be expected. This pain should eventually go away and should be easily controlled with oral pain medication that is prescribed upon discharge from the hospital.
- Because the XL surgery only splits muscles but does not cut muscles), many patients are able to get up and walk around the night after they have had surgery.
- The total time a patient spends in the hospital after the surgery depends on several factors, such as the number of vertebral levels that were treated, the severity of the problem and the patient’s overall health.
- Some patients who undergo an XL procedure are able to return home the same day as the surgery; others require a stay of a few days in the hospital.
- Most patients are able to return to their normal activities within a few weeks or months of surgery, depending of the patient’s type of work.
Previous lumbar Total Disc Replacement (TDR) devices require an anterior approach for implantation. This approach has inherent limitations, including risks to abdominal structures and the need for resection of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL). Placement of a TDR device from a true lateral (extreme lateral [XL]) approach is thought to offer a less invasive option to access the disc space (reduced risk of interrupting blood circulation in the left leg, significantly reduced risk of arterial thromboembolism, reduced risk of plaque embolism with arteriosclerosis), preserving the stabilizing ligaments and avoiding scarring of anterior vasculature.
When L5-S1 has to be included in the surgical treatment an anterior TDR procedure is performed. Some patients benefit from hybrid procedures; for example, a fusion performed anteriorly ALIF or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [TLIF] with cages and pedicles screws at L5-S1 and XL-ADR at the other lumbar levels or Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with Dynesys at L5-S1 and TDR at L4-5 or/and L3-4 could be performed.
Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine
Motion preservation procedures for the spine are a newer set of operations that have been devised to correct some of the problems we have had with previous spine surgeries.
Many times when attempting to treat pain, we look at the pain area, whether coming from the joints or relating to pressure on the nerves, rather than the disc itself.
We can sometimes help stabilize motion without removing the disc, using special flexible rods in the back of the spine with the same goal of helping to relieve pain, but maintaining some element of motion to help patients function better and still treat their pain. Posterior dynamic stabilization devices are analogous to an internal brace on the spine. The goal of posterior dynamic stabilization devices is to allow controlled motion in such a way as to achieve a more normal movement of the spine. These devices have been regularly used in Europe to treat patients with degenerative disc disease as dynamic stabilizers for the last 20 years.
Dynesys and Globus Medical devices are the only devices that allow multilevel stabilization in more than two segments. These systems are added to the spine without damaging the normal structure and are inserted by a Minimal Access Technique splitting muscles, not cutting them. It is the only technique with such versatility, keeping open any other future options.
We have used this technique for more than 12 years in more than 400 patients with excellent results in the following indications:
- Young people with invalidating low back pain and DDD with black disc and fissures.
- Elderly patients with canal stenosis for stabilization.
- Recurrent disc herniation.
- Mild segmental instability like retrolisthesis or grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Motion preservation surgery
|Barcelona Back Institute|
You only pay the agreed price with no last minute variations.
Procedures are in line with USA/UK standards.
Member of the Joint Commission International Association.
If you prefer you may call us on:
Spain +34 93 595 25 71
Local office hours 9am -6pm Monday –Friday
For a call back, please provide your contact details
- Motion Preservation Spinal surgeryMike Martin / London - United Kingdom
“Excellent treatment and services. Thank you.”
- Dyamic Stabilization of the Lumbar Spine “I was fortunate to meet Dr. Oliver, who took decisive action and decided to treat me by putting a dynamic stabilization system into my vertebra. Following this my recovery has been very rapid”Olwen / Dublin - Ireland
- Dynamic Stabilization of the Lumbar SpineGeorge Hart / London - United Kingdom
"A few years ago I started having leg and back pain, and an MRI scan found arthritis in my lumbar spine. Last year the pain grew so great that I contacted Barcelona Back Institute. The treatment and exercises prescribed to me really helped and now I'm virtually pain free."
- Artificial Disc ReplacementCristina Colorado / Barcelona - Spain
"The doctors' encouragement, patience and affection, were transformed into energy for my recovery to become a reality."
- Motion Preservation Spinal surgeryPavel Ushakov / St. Petersburg - Russia
“The first day that I was in the ICU, the care given as fantastic! On the day I was in my private room, the nurses were very friendly. The doctors are remarkable too, they explained everything very clearly! Keep up the good work! My personal thanks to all the doctors, nurses and staff of the hospital."